
The raw feeding movement has grown significantly in recent years, with advocates claiming it's the most natural and healthy way to feed dogs. But is raw food genuinely better than kibble, or is it more about marketing than science?
Proponents of raw feeding argue that dogs evolved to eat raw meat and bones, and that cooking destroys vital nutrients and enzymes. While there's some truth to the idea that processing can reduce certain nutrient levels, modern complete dry foods are formulated to meet all nutritional requirements after processing.
One clear advantage of raw food is ingredient transparency. Raw foods tend to have short, simple ingredient lists with clearly named meat sources. However, high-quality kibble brands also offer this level of transparency. The format itself doesn't determine ingredient quality.
There are practical considerations too. Raw food requires careful handling and storage to avoid bacterial contamination. It's generally more expensive per day and less convenient for travel or busy lifestyles. Kibble is shelf-stable, easy to portion, and widely available.
Our view at Furra is that both raw and kibble can provide excellent nutrition when the ingredients are high quality and the food is nutritionally complete. The best food for your dog is the one that suits their individual needs, your lifestyle, and your budget. Check our ratings to compare options across all formats.

Find the best food for your dog
Browse our independent, algorithm-based ratings for every dog food sold in the UK.
Browse Dog Foods →About the Author

Canine Nutrition Researcher
James has spent over a decade researching canine nutrition and pet food manufacturing processes. With a background in animal science from the University of Edinburgh, he leads Furra's ingredient analysis and rating methodology. When he's not dissecting dog food labels, you'll find him hiking the Scottish Highlands with his two Border Collies.
View all articles →

